Um judeu usou esta linguagem: "Sendo o Tanach «fake» o NT também é, já pode ir fumar maconha e «dar a bunda na boa", vai lá---
Será que isto é ser um judeu tentando ser um tipo de forma-paráfrase de um "nasi" [«dispatching apostles to preach, teach»1] que se deva seguir?
O que é um judeu? Um apologeta agressivo, que recorre ao vernáculo fácil e despudurado?2
1 - http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/…/ejud_0002_0014_0_1454…
2 - "Ó seu despudurado, vê lá se tens DESPUDOR, e evitas linguarejar despudoradamente sem qualquer despudur"
Será que isto é ser um judeu tentando ser um tipo de forma-paráfrase de um "nasi" [«dispatching apostles to preach, teach»1] que se deva seguir?
O que é um judeu? Um apologeta agressivo, que recorre ao vernáculo fácil e despudurado?2
1 - http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/…/ejud_0002_0014_0_1454…
2 - "Ó seu despudurado, vê lá se tens DESPUDOR, e evitas linguarejar despudoradamente sem qualquer despudur"
Vou publicar textos de um judaísmo sadio. São tirados de dois livretos judaicos.
Fontes:
Sefer HaSefirah [Sefirat HaOmer]
http://bauk.org/…/uplo…/Final-Version-of-Sefer-HaSefirah.pdf
http://bauk.org/…/Final-Version-of-Repent-Rejoice-Double-Pa…
http://bauk.org/wp-content/uploads/29-Arieh-Handler.pdf
Fontes:
Sefer HaSefirah [Sefirat HaOmer]
http://bauk.org/…/uplo…/Final-Version-of-Sefer-HaSefirah.pdf
http://bauk.org/…/Final-Version-of-Repent-Rejoice-Double-Pa…
http://bauk.org/wp-content/uploads/29-Arieh-Handler.pdf
- Manuel Magalhães Yevamos 64a: "G'd (D'us) craves(anseia/precisa) the prayers of the righteous." (Talmude). Argumento 1: "Why would G'd crave anything from us? G'd does not need our prayers, and He is not affected by them. Rather, the Talmud teaches that G'd craves to give us what is good for us, but we need merit to receive it. This merit comes through our prayers and berachot, as we acknowledge G'd and express our appreciation to Him (see also Nefesh HaChaim 2:2)." (http://www.shemayisrael.com/parsha/) || Argumento que apresenta uma outra visão rabínica: a) "Why do we pray out loud and why do we whisper when we pray if G-d knows what we are thinking?" Resposta: "http://www.lookstein.org/resources/experiential_tefillah.pdf - página 37"; b) "The first message of Yom Kippur is G'd wants us. No matter what we have done, G'd wants us close. There is nothing you can do to be disinvited to G'd’s love on Yom Kippur." (RABBI MICHAEL WHITMAN -http://www.adathcongregation.org/home.html)
- Manuel Magalhães "The name El-Shaddai is perplexing. It is often loosely translated as “G-d Almighty” but the tradition suggests otherwise. Rashi teaches that it means, “I am the One Whose G-dliness suffices for every creature“, based on the Hebrew root Dai, meaning enough, or sufficient. Just like our Passover song “Dayenu”, enough for us, G-d is enough for us.
Another explanation is proposed by the Ibn Ezra, who says that it is based on the Hebrew word “Shodded”, disruptor [http://www.thefreedictionary.com/disruptor] of nature."
- Manuel Magalhães Fonte: http://www.beitchaverim.com/
- Manuel Magalhães "When Noah came out of the ark he opened his eyes and saw the whole world completely destroyed. He began crying for the world and said ‘Master of the world! If You destroyed Your world because of human sin or human fools, then why did You create them’ One or the other You should do: either do not create the human being or do not destroy the world!’ He offered up offerings and began to pray before Him and the aroma ascended before the Blessed Holy One and was sweet.”
Rabi continued “A triple aroma ascended to God: the aroma of Noah’s offering, the aroma of his prayer, and the aroma of his actions. No aroma in the whole world was as pleasing to Him. Therefore He commanded: ‘Be observant and present to Me in due season My pleasing aroma’ (Num. 28:2) This means: ‘Be observant: Present to me the aroma that Noah presented to Me: the aroma of offering prayer and right action.”" - Manuel Magalhães http://www.beitchaverim.com/parsha-thoughts.html
- Manuel Magalhães "The Sages made a surprising claim about the power of teshuvah:
"Great is repentance, for it brings healing to the world... When an individual repents, he is forgiven, and the entire world with him." (Yoma 86b)" - Manuel Magalhães "The Midrash Tanchuma [...] cites the 6th verse from Psalm 95, “Let us come and prostrate ourselves and bow, and let us kneel before G-d, our maker.” The midrash asks, “why does the verse have three words that mean almost the same thing: prostrate, bo...Ver mais
- Manuel Magalhães Perhaps the upper double language is telling us we need to think outside of the box, to stretch ourselves in HaShem's mind. Just to ilustrate this we have the jew Daniel Lapin. He's an American Orthodox rabbi who asks: "Does G'd want people to be rich?...Ver mais
- Manuel Magalhães "There is a classic midrash that illustrates a creative approach [...].
Alexander the Great once visited the community of Afriki and wished to observe its judicial system. Two men came before the king for justice. The first said, “I purchased a plot of land from this man, and when I dug to lay the foundation of a home, I found a treasure buried there. I only bought the land, not the treasure, therefore it is not mine.” The seller said, “I too am fearful of the biblical prohibition of ‘lo tigzo”- do not steal’ and I too do not want it back unless it is definitely mine.” The king (judge) asked the buyer if he had a son, he answered “yes”. The seller answered positively to having a daughter. “Wonderful,” said the king, “let them marry and share the treasure.”
A wonderfully creative solution that leaves both litigants as partners in a just conclusion." - Manuel Magalhães E "Chat during synagogue services and G'd might kill you [D'us incomoda-se vivamente, fica triste a ponto de matar], the Talmud warns.
Read more: http://forward.com/.../rabbis-declare-war-on-chit.../..."
- Manuel Magalhães "“Woe to people who carry on conversations during prayer, for we have seen many synagogues destroyed because of this sin,” one late 19th-century rabbinic commentator warned.
Read more: http://forward.com/.../rabbis-declare-war-on-chit.../..."
- Manuel Magalhães "Certain Orthodox synagogues are worse than others. Large congregations can be noisier, though small congregations aren’t exempt.
And the problem isn’t limited to the Modern Orthodox. “It’s definitely an area where we have to improve,” said Ezra Friedlander, a New York-based political consultant who belongs to a Hasidic community in Brooklyn’s Boro Park. Friedlander takes it upon himself to shush the loudest talkers in the synagogue of the small Hasidic sect his father leads.
“It bothers me,” Friedander said. “God really does not appreciate when they talk.”
Some suggest that the problem stems from the length of the Orthodox service and the slack periods between important prayers. Others blame the comfort of Orthodox Jews in the sanctuary.
“Our congregations feel so at home in the synagogue that they lose some of the fear, reverence, that makes you not talk,” Lopatin said.
A search on the website of the Orthodox Union returns pages of articles about the problem. One goes so far as to effectively blame fathers who talk in synagogue for driving their kids away from Orthodoxy.
Read more: http://forward.com/.../rabbis-declare-war-on-chit.../..."
- Manuel Magalhães Enfim... prefiro a reverência e o temor cristãos. Mesmo um pastor ateu tem que se submeter à liturgia da Protestantse Kerk. Só o sermão pode ser autónomo.
- Manuel Magalhães Como eu amo o calvinismo e a sua ordem reverente. O HaShem é Um. Não chit-chat (um colectivo ruidoso [será que se exige aqui implicitamente uma teologia da substituição, já que os eleitos não sabem ser reverentes?! - kkkkkk!!!], espécie de trindade).
- Manuel Magalhães Pelo menos os filhos já desertaram. "driving their kids away from Orthodoxy"... kkkkkkkkkkkkk
- Manuel Magalhães E sobre Nazareth... http://www.is-there-a-god.info/.../did-bethlehem-and.../ »» "Until a few years ago, the only archaeological evidence for Nazareth amounted to little more than the remains of a winepress, a few tombs and a few artefacts. However in December 2009, the Israel Antiquities Authority issued a press release announcing that a house in Nazareth (see photo above) had now been excavated and had been found to contain artefacts from the “early Roman period” (first and second centuries). The archaeologists also found a pit hewn out of stone with a concealed entrance, which they believe was constructed as protection during the Jewish revolt of 67 CE.
This was seen by the Authority and others (The Guardian and the Huffington Post) as conclusive evidence that Nazareth did indeed exist in the first century. Based on the number of tombs found previously, they conclude that it was a small hamlet of about 50 houses.
Those who believe Nazareth didn’t exist have adjusted to this evidence, and tend to denigrate it as “sensationalist” (Nazareth: the town that theology built), or argue that the evidence doesn’t relate to the exact period of Jesus’ life, but several decades later (nazarethmyth.info). Nevertheless, scholars, who generally didn’t doubt that Nazareth existed as a small village, have been reinforced in their conclusions.
"
- Manuel Magalhães "In Surveys and Excavations at the Nazareth Village Farm (1997–2002): Final Report in the Bulletin of the Anglo-Israel Archaeological Society 2007 Volume 25, there is this comment about Nazareth:
[One author] “identified an ancient winepress associated with agricultural terraces in a small valley about 500 m from the site of ancient Nazareth. …. Potsherds found on the surface of the terraces dated, in particular, from what appeared to be the Early-to-Late Roman Period. It was concluded that these terraces and the wine press were connected with the nearby original town of ancient Nazareth, located just to the east. …. Surface pottery …. with the predominant forms deriving from the Early to Late Roman period.”
The early Roman period was first and second century. So that is clear evidence of settlement before this present study, which simply confirms the earlier discoveries and makes a first century date almost certain." - Manuel Magalhães "But [this] discovery [...] should have been subject to peer review. It was not, and all mention of the discovery was removed from the official website shortly after the single press release. The area was covered and built over so now, no independant verification is possible.”
- Manuel Magalhães Outra hipótese: "Now, if no evidence for an ancient town matching the Biblical narrative exists on the present-day site known as Nazareth, a much more plausible explanation is that the present-day site is located in the wrong place." - http://christianity.stackexchange.com/
- Manuel Magalhães "The idea that there were wandering preachers with an apocalyptic messages in 1st century Palestine seems certain. [...] The idea that one preacher was named Jesus, and that his failed predictions produced cognitive dissonance and alternate explanations is something that we can see through analogy happening throughout history. The idea that the stories would grow and develop is also something we can see happening in many other cases. So the historical Jesus theory seems to me to be a very parsimonious way of explaining the existence of the Jesus tradition.
In comparison, the Jesus myth theory is far more complicated. It involves gnostic conceptions of God, evolving legends of dying and rising saviors, followers quoting their messiah through revelation, the production and growth of a set of stories that combine these elements and eventually a process of forgetting in which this spectral figure becomes a historical one." - Manuel Magalhães "The philosopher Brian Keeley once suggested that some theories – conspiracy theories mainly – may remain unwarranted even if they are historically accurate. They are unwarranted because they require so much skepticism towards the evidence that they essentially destroy the process of history. Belief in them can never be warranted under the standard rules of history, and we’re not ready to give up on history just yet.
I’m wondering if the Christ Myth theory hasn’t reached that point, with its tendency to say that every story about Jesus is really derived from some other story and that every apparent claim is really a cipher for some other claim. Is there any ancient historical evidence that cannot be explained in this fashion?" -http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith
- Manuel Magalhães "The idea that there were wandering preachers with an apocalyptic messages in 1st century Palestine seems certain. [...] The idea that one preacher was named Jesus, and that his failed predictions produced cognitive dissonance and alternate explanation...Ver mais
- Manuel Magalhães "The philosopher Brian Keeley once suggested that some theories – conspiracy theories mainly – may remain unwarranted even if they are historically accurate. They are unwarranted because they require so much skepticism towards the evidence that they es...Ver mais
- Manuel Magalhães http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/.../father-jerome-murphy.../
- Manuel Magalhães Cito do link supra: "Details of the actual towns and locations mentioned in the gospels – Bethlehem, Jerusalem, Nazareth, Bethany-beyond-the-Jordan, Capernaum, Bethsaida, Magdala, Jericho and Bethany – are now firmly established on maps. His summaries of two of them, Jerusalem and Nazareth are, indeed, fascinating. He says that so much is known about the Jerusalem in which Jesus lived “that a 1:50 model has been built in the grounds of the Israel Museum. In general, it is very accurate.”
In contrast, he does not believe that all the 14 Stations of the Cross can be traced precisely, but he confirmed: “The location of the site of Golgotha and the tomb of Jesus is solidly attested by a critically tested pre-Constantinian tradition. Both are enclosed in the Holy Sepulchre church. Excavations beneath the church show that the tomb was located in a quarry abandoned in the second century BC.”
As the archaeology in the Jerusalem area has included a survey of a large number of its ancient tombs, it is now known that, “the tomb of Jesus must have been a kokhim (the bodies were placed in sealable horizontal shafts fronted by a ledge), first introduced into Palestine in the second century BC. Being short of time the disciples would have simply deposited the body of Jesus on the ledge. To prevent violation of the body by animals or birds, the entrance to the burial chamber from the vestibule would have been closed by a blocking stone like a plug (circular ones were very rare), which would have made removal difficult; the women were right to worry.”
Fr Jerry went on to say that the two miracles that Jesus worked in Jerusalem have been given accurate locations. Both were large open-air ritual pools, one at Siloam and the other called Bethesda, near Lion’s Gate. “There was a pagan healing temple at Bethesda in the second century AD, as the votive objects show. Its location, however, must have been determined by a tradition of healing going back at least to the previous century. This explains why Jesus found the sick gathered in the one place that gave them hope.”
As Nazareth has a special place in the hearts of many Christians, it was especially interesting to hear that archaeological discoveries have provided solid facts about life there during the boyhood of Jesus. “Even though excavations there have been sporadic and no clear picture emerges,” he explained, “first-century house foundations, together with the silos, oil presses and storage areas show what one would expect of a farming village. Nazareth would have been the agricultural supply centre of the nearby city Sepphoris, which in the youth of Jesus was in the process of reconstruction as a Roman city.”
Evidence points to the population of the city of Sepphoris, until AD70, being predominantly Jewish. This has been deduced not just by what archaeologists have found but what they have not. There are the remains of ritual baths along with a large number fragments of stone vessels (which cannot become ritually impure) – but there is a complete absence of pig bones or coins with pagan images." - Manuel Magalhães Fr Jerome Murphy-O’Connor, was a professor of the New Testament, at the École Biblique et Archéologique Française de Jérusalem. RIP, father!
Manuel Magalhães http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/.../father-jerome-murphy.../
Manuel Magalhães Cito do link supra: "Details of the actual towns and locations mentioned in the gospels – Bethlehem, Jerusalem, Nazareth, Bethany-beyond-the-Jordan, Capernaum, Bethsaida, Magdala, Jericho and Bethany – are now firmly established on maps.
Manuel Magalhães Fr Jerome Murphy-O’Connor, was a professor of the New Testament, at the École Biblique et Archéologique Française de Jérusalem. RIP, father!
Manuel Magalhães E encontrei um judeu fascinante que coloca em relevância histórica a tumba de Yeshu (pronúncia samaritana do nome Yeshua, Jesus). Primeiro ele acusa os seus compatriotas arqueólogos de serem parciais e patéticos. Leia: "Because it’s important for Christians that nothing historical be found that contradicts Pauline theology, Israeli archeologists have decided that – by definition – nothing can be found from the early Jesus movement. Their argument is that since the first followers of Jesus were Jews, they left nothing behind that distinguishes them from other Jews. This is patently absurd. There is no team that doesn’t have a uniform. Every Jewish movement, then and today, has distinguishing marks. But the absurdity is promoted because to say otherwise is to identify objects from the first century that contradict the official theology of the various Pauline Christian Churches. So any archeological artifact that might impact on Christianity is dated earlier or later than the time of Jesus. The Dead Sea Scrolls? Earlier. Anything with a cross on it? Later. Anything that can’t be dated earlier or later e.g., the infamous James ossuary, is declared a forgery. The name of the game is to keep archeology away from Christian theology.
Read more: Their Jesus, our Jesus | Simcha Jacobovici | The Blogs | The Times of Israel http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/their-jesus-our-jesus/...
Follow us: @timesofisrael on Twitter | timesofisrael on Facebook"
Read more: Their Jesus, our Jesus | Simcha Jacobovici | The Blogs | The Times of Israel http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/their-jesus-our-jesus/...
Follow us: @timesofisrael on Twitter | timesofisrael on Facebook"
Manuel Magalhães E depois fala-nos da tumba de Jesus. Veja: "The height of this absurdity is the tomb of Jesus and his family. It’s been found. It’s as simple as that. It has more evidence going for it than all other tombs combined. For example, as I write this, there is a tremendous exhibition at the Israel Museum celebrating Herod the Great’s tomb. Take note; no intact tomb was found, no intact coffin was found and absolutely no inscriptions. Yet scholars are sure that they have identified Herod’s tomb at Herodium. As another example, take the tomb of Caiaphas, the Jewish high priest who sent Jesus to the Romans who then sent him to the cross. Scholars are sure that his tomb has been found. His ossuary (bone box) is on display in the Israel Museum. This is the only instance where someone in the gospels has been identified in archeology. And yet, the ossuary in question has on it “Joseph Son of Caiaphas”. The gospel says his name was simply “Caiaphas”, not “Joseph”. 1st century historian Josephus talks of a high priest named “Joseph Caiaphas”, not “Son of Caiaphas”, but that doesn’t matter. Despite the fact that the inscriptions don’t match the texts, everyone is happy with the identification.
Having said all this, in Talpiot, in 1980, a tomb was found perfectly intact. In it, there were ten intact ossuaries. In fact, there were six perfectly clear inscriptions. These include a man named “Jesus Son of Joseph”, a woman named “Maria”, a man called “Yose” (exactly as one of Jesus’ brothers, Mark 6:3, Matthew 13:55-56), and a woman called – in Greek – “Mariamene”, a name that in all of Greek literature is associated with one woman only – Mary Magdalene. And yet, scholars are sure that the Jesus buried in Talpiot is not the Jesus of the gospels; that the Maria buried in Talpiot is not Jesus’ mother; that the Yose buried there is not Jesus’ brother; and that Mariamene is not Mary Magdalene. Why? Because this Jewish tomb contradicts Christian theology [a teologia conservadora crente na ressurreição literal. Sabem todos os teólogos cristãos imparciais que a ressurreição não foi literal. Leia, como ilustração do que afirmo:http://servicioskoinonia.org/relat/321.htm - "Repensar la resurrección. La fe en común en la diferencia de las interpretaciones" - Teólogo espanhol Andrés TORRES QUEIRUGA]. If he was buried here, he wasn’t buried in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. So you won’t see the Pope going to Talpiot.
Read more: Their Jesus, our Jesus | Simcha Jacobovici | The Blogs | The Times of Israel http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/their-jesus-our-jesus/...
Follow us: @timesofisrael on Twitter | timesofisrael on Facebook"
Having said all this, in Talpiot, in 1980, a tomb was found perfectly intact. In it, there were ten intact ossuaries. In fact, there were six perfectly clear inscriptions. These include a man named “Jesus Son of Joseph”, a woman named “Maria”, a man called “Yose” (exactly as one of Jesus’ brothers, Mark 6:3, Matthew 13:55-56), and a woman called – in Greek – “Mariamene”, a name that in all of Greek literature is associated with one woman only – Mary Magdalene. And yet, scholars are sure that the Jesus buried in Talpiot is not the Jesus of the gospels; that the Maria buried in Talpiot is not Jesus’ mother; that the Yose buried there is not Jesus’ brother; and that Mariamene is not Mary Magdalene. Why? Because this Jewish tomb contradicts Christian theology [a teologia conservadora crente na ressurreição literal. Sabem todos os teólogos cristãos imparciais que a ressurreição não foi literal. Leia, como ilustração do que afirmo:http://servicioskoinonia.org/relat/321.htm - "Repensar la resurrección. La fe en común en la diferencia de las interpretaciones" - Teólogo espanhol Andrés TORRES QUEIRUGA]. If he was buried here, he wasn’t buried in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. So you won’t see the Pope going to Talpiot.
Read more: Their Jesus, our Jesus | Simcha Jacobovici | The Blogs | The Times of Israel http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/their-jesus-our-jesus/...
Follow us: @timesofisrael on Twitter | timesofisrael on Facebook"
Manuel Magalhães Queiruga: "Pero, [...], eso obedece a un reflejo inconsciente de corte empirista . No acaba de percibirse que, aunque no haya irrupciones milagrosas, existe realmente una experiencia nueva causada por una situación inédita, en la que los discípulos y discípulas lograron descubrir la realidad y la presencia del Resucitado. La revelación consistió justamente en que comprendieron y aceptaron que esa situación sólo era comprensible porque estaba realmente determinada por el hecho de que Dios había resucitado a Jesús, el cual estaba vivo y presente de una manera nueva y trascendente. Manera no empírica, pero no por menos sino por más real: presencia del Glorificado y Exaltado."
Manuel Magalhães ! - "A ressurreição de Jesus suscitou sempre dúvidas nos cristãos e não é a inexistente “história factual” sobre o assunto que as vai desfazer, considera o padre Joaquim Carreira das Neves, especialista na Bíblia.
“Históricas são as dúvidas. Não nos escandalizemos, pois, se afirmarmos que não temos provas de história factual, mas apenas de história testemunhal”, e mesmo estas “nem sempre são fáceis de entender”, assinala o exegeta em artigo publicado na edição de hoje do Semanário Agência ECCLESIA.
O religioso franciscano realça que “nunca por nunca” os cristãos apresentaram “provas de história positiva sobre a ressurreição”: “Jesus Cristo fez-se aparecer a pessoas que, por sua vez, se apresentaram como tais. É, pois, uma prova ‘testemunhal’”.
O especialista indica várias interrogações levantadas pelos textos bíblicos que até hoje permanecem sem compreensão clara, como sucede na narrativa que descreve o aparecimento de Jesus, após a ressurreição, “a mais de quinhentos ‘irmãos’ de uma só vez”, número que não é mencionado em mais nenhum excerto.
“Como compreender (…) a primeira narrativa paulina a ser escrita (por volta do ano 53-55): ‘Apareceu a Pedro e, a seguir, ao grupo dos doze’”, questiona igualmente o especialista, para a seguir perguntar: “Não eram só onze?”.
Por outro lado, sublinha, a convicção na ressurreição de Jesus “complica-se” quando se inquire sobre o seu esclarecimento teológico: “Há uma explicação racional? Não passa duma asserção de fé? Não será uma pura metáfora?”.
O padre Carreira das Neves recorre à primeira carta de São Paulo aos cristãos de Corinto para avançar uma resposta: “Enterra-se um corpo mortal, e ressuscita imortal. Enterra-se um corpo sem beleza, e ressuscita cheio de esplendor; enterra-se um corpo fraco, e ressuscita forte. Enterra-se um simples corpo humano, e aparece depois um corpo cheio de vida nova, dada pelo Espírito”.
“São Paulo acreditava, pois, na ressurreição como acontecimento histórico: trata-se de um corpo ressurreccionado, que é diferente de um corpo apenas imortal ou espiritual”, considera o professor jubilado da Faculdade de Teologia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa.
O tema da ressurreição ganhou recentemente “dimensão nacional” em Espanha por causa de uma Notificação da Comissão para a Doutrina Cristã do episcopado local, dirigida ao teólogo Andrés Torres Queiruga.
O investigador espanhol defende “a ressurreição de Jesus Cristo ‘em espírito’, sem a necessidade primária do ‘corpo’” na obra ‘Repensar a Ressurreição’, refere o padre Carreira das Neves.
A tese implica que se por hipótese fosse encontrado o túmulo de Jesus com as suas ossadas, haveria “motivos para continuar a falar de ressurreição”, perspetiva também partilhada pelo “grande teólogo católico Karl Rahner”, escreve o exegeta português.
“Quem acredita, a começar pelos apóstolos, mulheres que vão ao túmulo, S. Paulo, carrega consigo o grande ‘mistério’ do Infinito no finito histórico de cada um”, aponta o biblista."
“Históricas são as dúvidas. Não nos escandalizemos, pois, se afirmarmos que não temos provas de história factual, mas apenas de história testemunhal”, e mesmo estas “nem sempre são fáceis de entender”, assinala o exegeta em artigo publicado na edição de hoje do Semanário Agência ECCLESIA.
O religioso franciscano realça que “nunca por nunca” os cristãos apresentaram “provas de história positiva sobre a ressurreição”: “Jesus Cristo fez-se aparecer a pessoas que, por sua vez, se apresentaram como tais. É, pois, uma prova ‘testemunhal’”.
O especialista indica várias interrogações levantadas pelos textos bíblicos que até hoje permanecem sem compreensão clara, como sucede na narrativa que descreve o aparecimento de Jesus, após a ressurreição, “a mais de quinhentos ‘irmãos’ de uma só vez”, número que não é mencionado em mais nenhum excerto.
“Como compreender (…) a primeira narrativa paulina a ser escrita (por volta do ano 53-55): ‘Apareceu a Pedro e, a seguir, ao grupo dos doze’”, questiona igualmente o especialista, para a seguir perguntar: “Não eram só onze?”.
Por outro lado, sublinha, a convicção na ressurreição de Jesus “complica-se” quando se inquire sobre o seu esclarecimento teológico: “Há uma explicação racional? Não passa duma asserção de fé? Não será uma pura metáfora?”.
O padre Carreira das Neves recorre à primeira carta de São Paulo aos cristãos de Corinto para avançar uma resposta: “Enterra-se um corpo mortal, e ressuscita imortal. Enterra-se um corpo sem beleza, e ressuscita cheio de esplendor; enterra-se um corpo fraco, e ressuscita forte. Enterra-se um simples corpo humano, e aparece depois um corpo cheio de vida nova, dada pelo Espírito”.
“São Paulo acreditava, pois, na ressurreição como acontecimento histórico: trata-se de um corpo ressurreccionado, que é diferente de um corpo apenas imortal ou espiritual”, considera o professor jubilado da Faculdade de Teologia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa.
O tema da ressurreição ganhou recentemente “dimensão nacional” em Espanha por causa de uma Notificação da Comissão para a Doutrina Cristã do episcopado local, dirigida ao teólogo Andrés Torres Queiruga.
O investigador espanhol defende “a ressurreição de Jesus Cristo ‘em espírito’, sem a necessidade primária do ‘corpo’” na obra ‘Repensar a Ressurreição’, refere o padre Carreira das Neves.
A tese implica que se por hipótese fosse encontrado o túmulo de Jesus com as suas ossadas, haveria “motivos para continuar a falar de ressurreição”, perspetiva também partilhada pelo “grande teólogo católico Karl Rahner”, escreve o exegeta português.
“Quem acredita, a começar pelos apóstolos, mulheres que vão ao túmulo, S. Paulo, carrega consigo o grande ‘mistério’ do Infinito no finito histórico de cada um”, aponta o biblista."
Manuel Magalhães http://www.agencia.ecclesia.pt/.../ressurreicao-de-jesus.../
Manuel Magalhães Teólogo e poeta Tolentino de Mendonça: http://jas-mim.blogspot.pt/.../tolentino-de-mendonca-e...
"Ninguém escolhe o país em que nasce: mas decidir ficar é um acto de amor. E de vontade de reinventar novos futuros", Adriano Moreira, 'Da Utopia à fronteira da pobreza'
JAS-MIM.BLOGSPOT.COM
- Manuel Magalhães Mas regressemos ao judeu que continua a fascinar-nos. A certa altura fala-nos de Kepha (São Pedro). Leia algo que o Vaticano recusa aceitar. Felizes as Testemunhas de Jeová que sempre tiveram essa intuição. "You won’t see the Pope going to the 2nd station on the Via Delarosa either. Why? Because in its museum there’s an ossuary that was excavated by Franciscan archeologist Bellarmino Bagatti. On it is inscribed the rare name “Simon Son of Jonah” or, in Aramaic, “Shimon Bar Yonah”, which happens to be the real name of the apostle nicknamed “Peter”. The Vatican wasn’t happy with Bagatti’s discovery because it means that Peter was buried in Jerusalem and not in Rome, under the Vatican where he’s supposed to be. All this archeology gets in the way of the theology. So… the Christians ignore it. And what’s worse, so do the Jews. We collaborate with mythologies – old and new. We don’t criticize the Pope when he goes to Bethlehem to hold mass for Muslims masquerading as Christians who are celebrating the “Palestinian Jesus”. Nor do we investigate our own history when it comes to the clear evidence that is emerging concerning the real followers of the Jewish Jesus. Instead, our scholars turn away from the archeological evidence and our leaders go to pay homage to the Pope when he refuses to come to the Prime Minister’s home.
As a final note, for his part, Jesus didn’t know that he was “Palestinian”. He didn’t know that Rome is the center of religious life. He didn’t even know he was a Christian. Jesus lived and died as a Jew. On his cross, the Romans, who crucified him, just like they crucified hundreds of thousands of other Jews, mockingly wrote: “King of the Jews”. Jesus instructed his apostles to avoid gentiles, and to preach only to “the lost sheep of Israel” (Matthew 15:24). He called non-Jewish idolaters “dogs” (Mark 7:24-37). One of his apostles was a “Sicarii” (Judah Iscariot) i.e., a member of a group of violent Jewish revolutionaries, and the other was called “Simon the Zealot” (Luke 6:15 and Acts 1:13). The zealots were the main anti-Roman Jewish rebels. Most importantly, Jesus said that he had come to fight for the Jewish people: “Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword” (Matthew 10:34-36).
From the gospels, what emerges is that Jesus would never have ignored his people, in favor of his enemies. He would not have celebrated any leader from Rome, the city that sent the legions that crucified him.
Read more: Their Jesus, our Jesus | Simcha Jacobovici | The Blogs | The Times of Israel http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/their-jesus-our-jesus/...
Follow us: @timesofisrael on Twitter | timesofisrael on Facebook"
- Manuel Magalhães Destaco: "Nor do we investigate our own history when it comes to the clear evidence that is emerging concerning the real followers of the Jewish Jesus. Instead, our scholars turn away from the archeological evidence and our leaders go to pay homage to the Pope when he refuses to come to the Prime Minister’s home."
- Manuel Magalhães Obrigado chaver Eliezer Abensur por me ajudares a compreender aprendendo e apreendendo com os yehudim. E a Simcha Jacobovici. Yeshu cada vez mais "vivo". Amen ve amem
- Manuel Magalhães Acerca disto lemos: Yochanam 17:21-24. “Para que todos sejam um, como Tu Pai és em mim, e eu para Ti. Para que eles possam ser um para nós, para que o mundo dê crédito que Tu me enviaste (como um shaliach-emissário). E eu doei a eles o esplendor (glória – o resultado da luz), o qual doaste a mim, para que sejam um como nós somos um, eu neles e Tu em mim, a fim de que possam ser aperfeiçoados em direção a Unidade, para que o mundo venha a conhecer a razão porque me enviaste e amaste eles da mesma forma que a mim. Pai, o meu desejo é que onde eu esteja possam eles também estarem comigo. Os quais me deste para que percebam o meu esplendor que me foi doado por Ti, pois me amaste antes da fundação do mundo (dos mundos)”.
- Manuel Magalhães Porque o crente calvinista predestinado vive permanentemente na serendipidade:http://www.espacoacademico.com.br/013/13mendes.htm »» Serendipismo ou serendipidade significa fazer descobertas felizes e por acaso, como o pão, o vinho, a lei da gravidade, a penicilina e o velcro. No nosso bom Português, seria atirar no que se vê e acertar no que não se vê. Serendipismo: Descoberta por Acidente e Sagacidade - Vide o link:
espacoacademico.com.br
2 - http://estrategiacriativa.blogspot.pt/.../serendipismo-no... »» O serendipismo é a pitada que falta no nosso espírito inovador e criativo (a RUAH Maiêutica, i.e., "Dar à Luz (Parto)" intelectual, da procura da verdade no interior do ser humano contingente - ser e não ser, o Adam Kadmon fragmentado), que é estar aberto ao inesperado. Planeie tudo, mas esteja pronto para aproveitar cada dificuldade no seu plano como uma oportunidade para descobrir algo novo.
Serendipismo: Descoberta por Acidente e Sagacidade
espacoacademico.com.br
Consultei o dicionário e entendi o signicado. Entretanto, algo instigou-me a buscar um pouco mais de informação da origem de seu significado e resultado divido com vocês a seguir.ESPACOACADEMICO.COM.BR - Manuel Magalhães "Tehilim 89: 52 Bendito sea Adonai para siempre. Amén y amén.
Baruj Adonai leolám, amén ve amén. " - Manuel Magalhães http://321judaismo.com/.../%C2%BFes-importante-decir-amen/
- PARTE II AQUI:
- http://rhemadizente.blogspot.pt/2014/11/o-jesus-deles-o-nosso-jesus-tertulia.html?zx=ac691c4ab9a75c03
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário
Shalom! Welcome to CAV Reformed Theology
Nota: só um membro deste blogue pode publicar um comentário.